you are here
Hmmmmm..., News, Opinion, Politics, religion

On the issue of meaning: Why we should be using “Daesh”

In war there is fighting, and then there is fighting with words. Propaganda is just as important to strategy as are positions and weapons.

In the US, and many Western countries, there is a war of words about the name to be used for the terrorist group led by Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. In a sense, double propaganda.

Is it the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, the Islamic State of Iraq and Levant, the Islamic State, or Daesh?

The evolution of a name

Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s group currently call themselves the Islamic State (IS), their opponents call them Daesh.

The change from ISIS, ISIL and IS to Daesh is rooted in interpretation. The evolution of the name comes partly from the group of extremists themselves, partly from locals, and partly from the “western world.”

As Daesh expanded its goals, they changed their name to more accurately represent their end game, according to Islamic State, Isis or Daesh: the dilemma of naming extremistsa report from “The Week” a UK magazine.

The report goes on to say that Daesh gave themselves the title of IS to claim representation of all Muslims, and a worldwide Islamic caliphate. “Daesh” is used by opponents in the region for a few reasons.

An accurate interpretation.

Daesh (die-esh) is the sound, or most closely interpreted sound, for the Arabic acronym used for the terrorist group. Partners in the Middle East point out there is no state to fight, and they should not be given such authority or credence.

Varied meanings

Daesh has come to have derogatory meanings in the Middle East. The acronym sounds similar to the words for trampling underfoot, or sowing discord. It has also been morphed into a new meaning in Arabic, oppressive bigots.

Daesh separates the terrorists from Islam. Discrediting their main claim is important when it comes to recruiting new members.

They hate it. 

Daesh have deemed the phrase disrespectful. Apparently threatening to cut out the tongues of anyone using it. They also beat a child in Iraq after he dared to say it.

World leaders outside the Middle East are starting to catch on, with some push from Arabic leadership.

A recent article in The Inquisitr explains why Australian prime minister, Tony Abbot, began using the term.

“…We probably should refer to this organisation by the term that is most used by its opponents in those countries,” Abbot said.

A Google News search reveals few US outlets, and even fewer representatives, using the term widely used by their counterparts in the Middle East and allies worldwide.

Despite the long-standing US policy that this is not a religious war and that “we are not at war with Islam,” there is a distinct attitude among conservatives we are in such a conflict.

There is still a fervor to make this exclusively about Islam.

Some of our own “radicals” believe not referring to this group specifically as “Islamic” or “radical Muslims” somehow diminishes the seriousness of the situation, reveals an “Obama” conspiracy, or is more about not offending Muslims.

What it comes down to…

It is reasonable to have a supportive message of the partnerships with the people in the region, those truly on the front lines of this conflict. It is very important to our Middle East collaborators that these extremists be separated from their religion.

There is a constant call for denouncement of groups like Daesh from the broader Muslim community. It is clearly answered, and largely ignored by fear-mongering actors. These actors are the perfect example of modern yellow-journalism.

Political leaders need to use Daesh to mold that narrative of the conflict. It benefits our end objective to take away all credit of a holy and sovereign claim.

History shows us that propaganda against an entire ethnic group leads to further conflicts, long-term mistrust, and hate crimes. However, shaping a narrative that takes away the credibility of the specific group at hand is a necessary tool in fighting an unconventional war.

Prime Minister Abbot sums up the reasoning nicely.

“I would strongly counsel people against ever using the presumptuous title that they have given themselves … Daesh hates being referred to by this term, and what they don’t like has an instinctive appeal to me….,” Abbot said.


About Dirty Diatribe

News Junkie


10 thoughts on “On the issue of meaning: Why we should be using “Daesh”

  1. I really like this article. I want to share on mine and Reblog. I like the term and agree we should start using it.

    Posted by mtriver | February 20, 2015, 3:32 am
  2. Reblogged this on MtRiver and commented:
    This is definitely something the US media needs to start using. We are not in a fight against Islam, but against those that want to control the world. Daesh needs to catch on and we can help by using it first.

    Posted by mtriver | February 20, 2015, 3:35 am
  3. Reblogged this on My Soap Box.

    Posted by mln1991 | February 20, 2015, 5:46 am
  4. Great article. The sooner we begin to call them Daesh the better

    Posted by mln1991 | February 20, 2015, 5:48 am
  5. Reblogged this on patricknelson750 and commented:
    This is a very well thought out post that manages to hit the nail on the head. The fact that so few people have made the same suggestions reminds me of the story of the Emperor with no clothes. In the story it just took one boy to see…

    Posted by patricknelson750 | February 21, 2015, 10:47 pm
  6. Great article, really makes you stop and think.

    Posted by Jeanette Montgomery-Voet | February 22, 2015, 8:19 pm
  7. Finally someone explains all the different names!

    Posted by barbaramarinh | February 24, 2015, 5:36 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: